Margareta Nilsdotter
Swedish businesswoman and shipbuilder
Margareta Nilsdotter also called Margareta Hybertsson (d. 1630) was a Swedish businessperson and shipbuilder. In 1627, she completed construction of the Swedish warship Vasa.
Margareta is noted to have been a native Swede. She has been called Margareta Hybertsson, however both the last name of herself and her husband was patronymics, so the male patronymicon Hybertsson would not strictly have been hers, even if she is sometime mentioned as such.
She was first married to Dutch born master shipbuilder Henrik Hybertsson (dead 1627) who was engaged to build the Vasa in 1625. When she was widowed in 1627, she took over the share of her late spouse and the responsibility to complete the building of the Vasa, a task she fulfilled the following year. She handled a strike and a period of inflation during her tenure.
She inherited responsibility for completion of the contract, but while she was an accomplished businesswoman in her own right and had responsibility for the management of the rural estates which provided part of the family's income, she was not a shipbuilder. After a period of turbulence, the Crown appointed its representative in the navy yard, Captain Söfring Hansson, to manage the yard.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Margareta Nilsdotter” is swedish businesswoman and shipbuilder. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Margareta, Nilsdotter and Swedish, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “swedish businesswoman and shipbuilder” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 11, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q27994864. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1630, 1627 and 1625.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Margareta Nilsdotter”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Margareta Nilsdotter primary sources, Margareta Nilsdotter archive and Margareta research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Margareta Nilsdotter”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Margareta Nilsdotter” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.