CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Marcus Minucius Felix

Latin-language writer

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 27, 2026
Entity authorityQ319423 ↗
Source-derived summary

Marcus Minucius Felix (died c. AD 250 in Rome) was a Roman legal practitioner and one of the earliest Latin apologists for Christianity.

Biography

Nothing is known of his personal history, and even the date at which he wrote can be only approximately ascertained as between AD 150 and 270. The name of Marcus Minucius Felix indicates his association with the gens Minucia.

Causidicus

Minucius held the title causidicus as a legal practitioner. A causidicus (literally "case-speaker") was a courtroom advocate whose primary job was to deliver oral arguments before a judge or tribunal. Roman law mandated a sharp division of labor. The iurisconsultus (jurist) provided the theoretical legal framework and opinions, while the causidicus provided the rhetoric and performance. By AD 200, the term often carried a slightly derogatory or "working-class" connotation compared to the title of advocatus. While an advocatus was seen as a distinguished friend or patron, the causidicus was viewed as a paid professional — a "hired tongue." Despite the low social status assigned by the elite, they were the backbone of the legal system. By this period, Cincian Law (which originally banned legal fees) was largely bypassed; causidici operated for profit, though fees were legally capped.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Marcus Minucius Felix” as latin-language writer. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Marcus, Minucius and Felix.

Editorial reviewA useful biographical orientation record, particularly for establishing names, roles and a first chronology. The current 201-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 0200. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Marcus, Minucius and Felix providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Marcus Minucius Felix”, the useful work is to connect “latin-language writer” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Biographical claims are most persuasive when dates, appointments and relationships can be traced to records created close to the events described. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 27, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q319423. VIAF identifies the subject as 61540251. The Library of Congress control number is n83165536. 2 of 6 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank.

Critical limits

Later biographies can compress uncertainty and repeat inherited reputations, so apparently settled claims may still require comparison. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Marcus Minucius Felix”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Marcus Minucius Felix primary sources, Marcus Minucius Felix archive and Marcus research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Marcus Minucius Felix”?
  2. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
  3. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Marcus Minucius Felix” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.