CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Marcus Bourne Huish

English barrister and art collector

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 14, 2025
Entity authorityQ6758048 ↗
Source-derived summary

Marcus Bourne Huish (25 November 1843 – 4 May 1921) was an English barrister, writer and art dealer.

He was the son of Marcus Huish of Castle Donington and his wife Margaret Jane Bourne. His mother died in 1847 and in 1849 his father remarried Frances Sarah Darwin, daughter of Sir Francis Sacheverel Darwin. Bourne was the editor of The Art Journal from 1881 to 1892 and was the first managing director of the Fine Art Society. He was a Japanophile and was given the honour of Chevalier of the Order of the Sacred Treasure. He was the Honorary Librarian of The Japan Society of the UK.

Books

Charles Méryon, sailor, engraver, and etcher : a memoir and complete descriptive catalogue of his works / translated from the French of Philip Burty by Marcus B. Huish. Charles Méryon et son œuvre.English. Fine Art Society. 1879.

Japan and its art.

Editorial summary

“Marcus Bourne Huish” enters the record as english barrister and art collector. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Marcus, Bourne and Huish can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1843, 1921, 1847, 1849—that can be checked directly. The authority record carries competing date values—1843-01-01, 1845-01-01—which should remain separate until their references and qualifiers are resolved. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Marcus, Bourne and Huish.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Marcus Bourne Huish” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Marcus, Bourne and Huish provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 14, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q6758048. VIAF identifies the subject as 19995724. The Library of Congress control number is n79043457. 4 of 4 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1843, 1921, 1847 and 1849.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Marcus Bourne Huish”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Marcus Bourne Huish primary sources, Marcus Bourne Huish archive and Marcus research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Marcus Bourne Huish”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Marcus Bourne Huish” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.