CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Marcopoloichthys

extinct genus of fishes

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionNov 17, 2024
Entity authorityQ55831499
Source-derived summary

Marcopoloichthys is an extinct genus of marine teleosteomorph ray-finned fish known from the Middle and Late Triassic of the former Tethys Ocean (Italy, Switzerland, and China). It is the only genus in the family Marcopoloichthyidae. It was originally described based on specimens from both Italy and China, hence the name Marcopoloichthys, which references the medieval Venetian merchant Marco Polo, who traveled from Italy to China.

Five species are known:

M. ani Tintori et al., 2007 – Anisian of Yunnan, China. (type species)

M. andreetti Tintori et al., 2007 – Ladinian of Lombardy, Italy.

M. faccii (Gortani, 1907) – Carnian of Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Italy (initially described as Pholidophorus faccii)

M. furreri Arratia, 2022 – Ladinian of Grisons, Switzerland

M. mirigioliensis Arratia et al., 2024 – late Anisian of the Besano Formation (Monte San Giorgio, Ticino, Switzerland)

The youngest Marcopoloichthys fossils are of an undescribed species from the Norian of Friuli, Italy.

Marcopoloichthys was a small, scaleless fish with highly specialized, protractile jaws for suction feeding, and a combination of primitive and advanced morphological characters that make it difficult to phylogenetically place. Initially described as an indeterminate basal neopterygian, more recent studies have found it to be a stem-teleost. It somewhat resembles another early teleostomorph, Prohalecites.

Editorial summary

“Marcopoloichthys” enters the record as extinct genus of fishes. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Marcopoloichthys, extinct and genus can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical orientation to terminology and classification, particularly when read beside dated observations, specimens or technical literature. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2007, 1907, 2022, 2024—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Marcopoloichthys, extinct and genus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Marcopoloichthys” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Marcopoloichthys, extinct and genus provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 17, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q55831499. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2007, 1907, 2022 and 2024.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Marcopoloichthys”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Marcopoloichthys primary sources, Marcopoloichthys archive and Marcopoloichthys research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Marcopoloichthys”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Marcopoloichthys” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.