Emanuele Manitta
Italian footballer

Emanuele Manitta (born 12 January 1977) is a retired Italian football goalkeeper.
Football career
Early career
A native of Caltagirone, Sicily, he spent one season at youth rank of A.S. Bari before to move to Sicilian amateur club U.S. Ragusa, at that time at Serie D. He then moved to Peloro Calcio of Serie D. In summer 1997, Peloro merged with Messina, at that time at Serie D.
Messina
At Messina, he helped the club gain promotion to Serie C2 in summer 1998, and to Serie C1 in summer 2000.
He won a loan contract from U.S. Lecce in summer 2000, but did not play.
He returned to Messina in summer 2001, this time at Serie B.
He won another loan contract from S.S.C. Napoli (Serie B) in January 2003, to replace Marco Storari, later the move became permanent. He played 41 out of 42 Serie B games that season.
But Napoli faced bankrupt in summer 2004, he started his career that finding a club in every summer.
Later career
He was first for Catanzaro (Serie B), but the club almost failed to protect her place on Serie B. He then joined Bologna as backup of Gianluca Pagliuca in Serie B, where he just made 2 appearances.
In summer 2006, he joined Livorno, where he made his Serie A debut on 21 January 2007 in a 1–1 draw against A.S. Roma. As a backup for Marco Amelia, he also played 8 Serie A games, but none in the 2006–07 UEFA Cup.
In summer 2007, he moved back to Messina, ahead Gabriele Paoletti as first choice, where he played 30 Serie B games.
“Emanuele Manitta” enters the record as italian footballer. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Emanuele, Manitta and Italian can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Emanuele Manitta” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Emanuele, Manitta and Italian provides the most credible route into that argument.
Chronology provides the most reliable spine for this subject; interpretation should follow only after identities and dates are secure. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 5, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q661827. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1977, 1997, 1998 and 2000.
Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.
- Establishing names and roles
- Building a first chronology
- Locating cited institutions
Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Emanuele Manitta”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Emanuele Manitta primary sources, Emanuele Manitta archive and Emanuele research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Emanuele Manitta”?
- How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
- Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Emanuele Manitta” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.