CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

Management by objectives

defining and tackling organization goals

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 8, 2026
Entity authorityQ1045631
Source-derived summary

Management by objectives (MBO), also known as management by planning (MBP), is a management style involving the defining of specific objectives within an organization and subsequent deciding how to achieve each objective in sequence. It was first popularized by Peter Drucker in his 1954 book The Practice of Management. In this system of management, individual goals are synchronized with the goals of the organization, with employee performance being measured and compared with set standards. According to MBO theory, when employees themselves have been involved with the goal-setting and choosing the course of action to be followed by them, they are more likely to fulfill their responsibilities.

According to George S. Odiorne, the system of management by objectives can be described as a process whereby the superior and subordinate jointly identify common goals, define each individual's major areas of responsibility in terms of expected results, and use these measures as guides for operating the unit and assessing the contribution of each of its members.

History

Peter Drucker first used the term "management by objectives" in his 1954 book The Practice of Management. While the basic ideas of MBO were not original to Drucker, he pulled from other management practices to create a complete system. MBO draws on Mary Parker Follett's 1926 essay, The Giving of Orders. Drucker's student, George Odiorne, continued to develop the idea in his book Management Decisions by Objectives, published in the mid-1960s. MBO was popularized by companies like Hewlett-Packard, which claimed it led to their success.

Editorial summary

“Management by objectives” enters the record as defining and tackling organization goals. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Management, objectives and defining can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA strong contextual entry point for chronology, institutions and public events when official records are distinguished from later interpretation. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1954, 1926—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Management, objectives and defining.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Management by objectives” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Management, objectives and defining provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Contemporary correspondence, administrative files and participant testimony can test how later narratives organized the event or institution. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 8, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1045631. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1954 and 1926.

Critical limits

Official terminology may obscure informal participation, dissent or communities documented only indirectly. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Management by objectives”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Management by objectives primary sources, Management by objectives archive and Management research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Management by objectives”?
  2. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
  3. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Management by objectives” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.