CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Places & Architecture

Malinovsky (urban-type settlement)

human settlement in Sovetsky District, Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug, Russia

Architectural plans, a scale model, maps and brass measuring instruments
Places and architectureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 15, 2026
Entity authorityQ4277945 ↗
Source-derived summary

Malinovsky (Russian: Малиновский) is an urban locality (an urban-type settlement) in Sovetsky District of Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug, Russia. Population: 2,755 (2010 census); 2,621 (2002 census); 2,956 (1989 Soviet census).

Editorial summary

“Malinovsky (urban-type settlement)” enters the record as human settlement in Sovetsky District, Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug, Russia. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Malinovsky, urban-type and settlement can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA valuable geographic starting point for tracing changing names, boundaries, uses and administrative responsibility. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2010, 2002, 1989—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1963-01-01. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Malinovsky, urban-type and settlement.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Malinovsky (urban-type settlement)” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Malinovsky, urban-type and settlement provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Place names and jurisdictional language are key evidence: both can reveal earlier catalogue descriptions and overlooked record series. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 15, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q4277945. Authority coordinates are 61.195, 62.840. 4 of 4 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2010, 2002 and 1989.

Critical limits

A single description cannot reconcile every naming convention, rebuilding phase or administrative transfer associated with a place. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Treat names, boundaries and functions as historically changeable. Maps, plans, inventories and administrative records can clarify what the place meant at different dates.

Best used for
  • Historic place names
  • Jurisdictional context
  • Routes into maps and plans
Verify next

Contemporary maps, plans, listed-building records, estate papers and the responsible local or national archive.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Malinovsky (urban-type settlement)”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Malinovsky (urban-type settlement) primary sources, Malinovsky (urban-type settlement) archive and Malinovsky research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Malinovsky (urban-type settlement)”?
  2. What physical evidence or contemporary plan supports the description?
  3. Which earlier names or jurisdictions may reveal additional records?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Malinovsky (urban-type settlement)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.