Maik Langendorf
Austrian darts player
Maik Langendorf (born 11 March 1972) is a German-based Austrian former professional darts player, who played in Professional Darts Corporation (PDC) events.
He represented Austria in the PDC World Cup of Darts twice, alongside Mensur Suljovic in 2010 and 2013. He is a former PDC Tour Card holder, having held one from 2017 to 2018 after winning it at 2017's PDC Q–School.
Career
2010
He represented Austria at the 2010 PDC World Cup of Darts, partnering Mensur Suljović. They were seeded 14th and defeated 19th seed Denmark 6–4 in the first round.
2013
In February 2013, he represented Austria at the PDC World Cup of Darts for a second time. At the 2013 event he once again partnered Mensur Suljović. They were placed in Group A alongside Japan, who defeated Austria 5–4 in a deciding leg, and number 1 seed England who beat Austria 5–2, leaving Austria bottom of the group with 0 points and therefore eliminated in the group stage.
2017
He won a PDC tour card on the second day of the 2017 PDC Darts Qualifying School.
2018
In October 2018, Langendorf qualified for the 2018 World Series of Darts Finals through the Tour Card Holder qualifier.
“Maik Langendorf” enters the record as austrian darts player. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Maik, Langendorf and Austrian can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Maik Langendorf” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Maik, Langendorf and Austrian provides the most credible route into that argument.
The entry’s evidential value lies in the named roles, institutions and publications that can be tested against primary documentation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 23, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q28530511. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1972, 2010, 2013 and 2017.
A concise life account rarely captures disputed attribution, private networks or the changing language used to describe a career. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.
- Establishing names and roles
- Building a first chronology
- Locating cited institutions
Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Maik Langendorf”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Maik Langendorf primary sources, Maik Langendorf archive and Maik research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Maik Langendorf”?
- Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
- How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Maik Langendorf” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.