CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Mai Na Lee

associate professor of history and Asian American studies at the University of Minnesota–Twin Cities

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJan 21, 2026
Entity authorityQ131443652 ↗
Source-derived summary

Mai Na Lee (also Mai Na M. Lee; c. 1971) is an associate professor of history and Asian American studies at the University of Minnesota–Twin Cities. She holds a PhD from the University of Wisconsin–Madison and is a researcher for the Hmong Studies Consortium. Lee is the first Hmong American to earn a doctorate in the field of history. Her book is Dreams of the Hmong Kingdom: The Quest for Legitimation in French Indochina, 1850–1960, which details the historical politics of Hmong in Laos.

Early life and education

Born in Pha Nok Kok, in the sub-district of Muang Pha, Xieng Khouang, Laos, Lee crossed the Mekong River to Thailand with her family in 1979, and came to the United States as a Hmong refugee in 1980 around the age of 11. Her family was first resettled in Wisconsin, and later moved to the Twin Cities in Minnesota to be closer to relatives and resources tailored to Hmong people. She grew up in Saint Paul, Minnesota. She is a member of the Hmong Lee (also spelled Ly) clan.

As an undergraduate she decided to be a historian once realizing little Hmong history was recorded. In 1994 she graduated Carleton College as a Cowling Scholar with a major in East Asian History and a concentration in Women's Studies.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Mai Na Lee” as associate professor of history and Asian American studies at the University of Minnesota–Twin Cities. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA useful biographical orientation record, particularly for establishing names, roles and a first chronology. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1971, 1850, 1960, 1979—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where associate, professor and history can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the people & ideas register because the source frames it as associate professor of history and Asian American studies at the University of Minnesota–Twin Cities. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Chronology provides the most reliable spine for this subject; interpretation should follow only after identities and dates are secure. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 21, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q131443652. VIAF identifies the subject as 310725887. The Library of Congress control number is no2014127354. 1 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1971, 1850, 1960 and 1979.

Critical limits

A concise life account rarely captures disputed attribution, private networks or the changing language used to describe a career. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Mai Na Lee”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Mai Na Lee primary sources, Mai Na Lee archive and associate research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Mai Na Lee”?
  2. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
  3. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Mai Na Lee” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.