CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Mahsa Amrabadi

Iranian journalist

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 14, 2026
Entity authorityQ4984839 ↗
Source-derived summary

Mahsa Amrabadi (Persian: مهسا امرآبادی; born July 3, 1984, in Rasht, Gilan) is an Iranian journalist.

Amrabadi, along with her husband and reformist journalist Masoud Bastani, was arrested after the disputed presidential election of June 2009. She was sentenced to 2 years in prison. She was released from prison in 2013.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Mahsa Amrabadi” as iranian journalist. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Mahsa, Amrabadi and Iranian.

Editorial reviewA productive starting point for separating a subject’s documented career from later reputation and commemoration. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1984, 2009, 2013—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1984-07-03. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Mahsa, Amrabadi and Iranian providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Mahsa Amrabadi”, the useful work is to connect “iranian journalist” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Biographical claims are most persuasive when dates, appointments and relationships can be traced to records created close to the events described. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 14, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q4984839. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1984, 2009 and 2013.

Critical limits

Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Mahsa Amrabadi”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Mahsa Amrabadi primary sources, Mahsa Amrabadi archive and Mahsa research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Mahsa Amrabadi”?
  2. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
  3. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Mahsa Amrabadi” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.