CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Madschun

Turkish fairy tale

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 18, 2026
Entity authorityQ6728724
Source-derived summary

Madschun is a Turkish fairy tale from Andrew Lang's The Olive Fairy Book. The tale was first published by folklorist Ignác Kúnos in a collection of Turkish folktales.

Translations

The tale was also translated into English as "Madjun".

Summary

Once, there was a young man who, even from childhood, had never grown any hair. One day, he saw the Sultan's daughter and became determined to marry her.

He first sent his mother to ask the Sultan for his daughter's hand in marriage. The Sultan was intrigued by the request, and told the woman to send her son to him. However, by the time the son arrived, the Sultan's interest had waned, and he only wanted to be rid of the boy. So he told the boy that he must first gather all the birds of the world and bring them to the Sultan's garden, which had no birds.

After wandering for a time, the boy met a dervish, and asked for his help.

Editorial summary

“Madschun” enters the record as turkish fairy tale. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Madschun, Turkish and fairy can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current 163-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Madschun, Turkish and fairy.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Madschun” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Madschun, Turkish and fairy provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 18, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q6728724. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Madschun”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Madschun primary sources, Madschun archive and Madschun research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Madschun”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Madschun” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.