CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Vitrectomy

surgery to remove some or all of the vitreous humor from the eye

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 30, 2026
Entity authorityQ924295
Source-derived summary

Vitrectomy is a surgery to remove some or all of the vitreous humor from the eye.

Anterior vitrectomy entails removing small portions of the vitreous humor from the front structures of the eye—often because these are tangled in an intraocular lens or other structures.

Pars plana vitrectomy is a general term for a group of operations accomplished in the deeper part of the eye, all of which involve removing some or all of the vitreous humor—the eye's clear internal jelly.

Even before the modern era, some surgeons performed crude vitrectomies. Dutch surgeon Anton Nuck (1650–1692) claimed to have removed vitreous by suction in a young man with an inflamed eye. In Boston, John Collins Warren (1778–1856) performed a crude limited vitrectomy for angle closure glaucoma.

Anesthesia for vitrectomy

Options for anesthesia for vitrectomy are general anaesthesia, local anesthesia, topical anesthesia and intracameral lidocaine irrigation.

Each anesthesia technique has its advantages and disadvantages, and the selection of anesthesia will depend on various factors including the surgeon's and patient's choice, disease and additional surgical steps required.

Pars plana vitrectomy

Although Robert Machemer has historically been credited with developing pars plana vitrectomy, Anton Banko patented the procedure for closed vitrectomy in 1968, predating Machemer's first reported operation by three years. Machemer performed the first reported human closed pars plana vitrectomy in 1970, and subsequently helped establish the technique as a standard approach to vitreous surgery.

Editorial summary

“Vitrectomy” enters the record as surgery to remove some or all of the vitreous humor from the eye. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Vitrectomy, surgery and remove can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1650, 1692, 1778, 1856—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Vitrectomy, surgery and remove.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Vitrectomy” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Vitrectomy, surgery and remove provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 30, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q924295. The first chronological checks are 1650, 1692, 1778 and 1856.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Vitrectomy”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Vitrectomy primary sources, Vitrectomy archive and Vitrectomy research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Vitrectomy”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Vitrectomy” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.