CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Mabel Green

British actress (1887-1975)

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 13, 2025
Entity authorityQ106603101
Source-derived summary

Mabel Green (1 November 1887 – 29 November 1975), born Mabel Gladys Coomber, was a British actress.

Early life

Mabel Gladys Coomber was born in Notting Hill, London, the daughter of Alfred Coomber and Matilda (Maud) Tanner Coomber.

Career

Mabel Green first came to attention in the English adaptation of André Messager's The Little Michus (1905), with Adrienne Augarde; the reviewer in The Observer found Green and Augarde's performances "refreshing," "singing and acting as they did with a girlish abandon and an absence of effort." Later stage appearances came for Green in The Dairymaids (1907), The Florentine Tragedy (1909), The Balkan Princess (1910), and in pantomimes Cinderella (1920–1921), Tom, Tom, the Piper's Son (1921–1922), and The Co-optimists (1924). She was popular as a subject of postcard photographs and other memorabilia.

In 1911 Green sang at the Tivoli music hall. Her performances there were not so well-received as her other work, with the Guardian reviewer commenting that "Mabel Green has a nice, sweet voice, a pretty smile, and some other qualities, but you cannot feel that there is any meaning in the gentle sentiments she sings about."

Green was an early motoring enthusiast, posing for photographs with her REO Landaulette in 1907.

Personal life

Mabel Green married three times. Her first husband was Tom Stanley Steel; they married in South Africa in 1912. They divorced in 1917. Her second husband was Prussian-born Julius Sigismund Wetzlar, deputy chairman of the Anglo American Corporation of South Africa.

Editorial summary

“Mabel Green” enters the record as british actress (1887-1975). Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Mabel, Green and British can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewStrongest as a route into the people, institutions and dated events that shaped the subject’s public record. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1887, 1975, 1905, 1907—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1887-11-01. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Mabel, Green and British.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Mabel Green” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Mabel, Green and British provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The entry’s evidential value lies in the named roles, institutions and publications that can be tested against primary documentation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 13, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q106603101. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1887, 1975, 1905 and 1907.

Critical limits

A concise life account rarely captures disputed attribution, private networks or the changing language used to describe a career. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Mabel Green”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Mabel Green primary sources, Mabel Green archive and Mabel research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Mabel Green”?
  2. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
  3. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Mabel Green” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.