CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Weierstrass M-test

criterion about convergence of series

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 28, 2025
Entity authorityQ1072412
Source-derived summary

In mathematics, the Weierstrass M-test is a test for determining whether an infinite series of functions converges uniformly and absolutely. It applies to series whose terms are bounded functions with real or complex values, and is analogous to the comparison test for determining the convergence of series of real or complex numbers. It is named after the German mathematician Karl Weierstrass (1815–1897).

Statement

Weierstrass M-test.

Suppose that (fn) is a sequence of real- or complex-valued functions defined on a set A, and that there is a sequence of non-negative numbers (Mn) satisfying the conditions

|

f

n

(

x

)

|

M

n

{\displaystyle |f_{n}(x)|\leq M_{n}}

for all

n

1

{\displaystyle n\geq 1}

and all

x

A

{\displaystyle x\in A}

, and

n

=

1

M

n

{\displaystyle \sum _{n=1}^{\infty }M_{n}}

converges.

Then the series

n

=

1

f

n

(

x

)

{\displaystyle \sum _{n=1}^{\infty }f_{n}(x)}

converges absolutely and uniformly on A.

A series satisfying the hypothesis is called normally convergent. The result is often used in combination with the uniform limit theorem. Together they say that if, in addition to the above conditions, the set A is a topological space and the functions fn are continuous on A, then the series converges to a continuous function.

Proof

Consider the sequence of functions

S

n

(

x

)

=

k

=

1

n

f

k

(

x

)

.

{\displaystyle S_{n}(x)=\sum _{k=1}^{n}f_{k}(x).}

Since the series

n

=

1

M

n

{\displaystyle \sum _{n=1}^{\infty }M_{n}}

converges and Mn ≥ 0 for every n, then by the Cauchy criterion,

ε

>

0

:

N

:

m

>

n

>

N

:

k

=

n

+

1

m

M

k

<

ε

.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Weierstrass M-test” as criterion about convergence of series. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1815, 1897—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Weierstrass, M-test and criterion can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as criterion about convergence of series. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 28, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q1072412. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1815 and 1897.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Weierstrass M-test”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Weierstrass M-test primary sources, Weierstrass M-test archive and Weierstrass research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Weierstrass M-test”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Weierstrass M-test” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.