CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Arts & Letters

Monumentum pro Gesualdo

ballet by George Balanchine

Manuscripts, fine bindings, an engraving plate and preserved performance ephemera
Arts and lettersInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 29, 2026
Entity authorityQ3323503 ↗
Source-derived summary

Monumentum pro Gesualdo is a 1960 arrangement and recomposition by Igor Stravinsky of three madrigals by Carlo Gesualdo:

Asciugate i begli occhi (Book 5, XIV)

Ma tu, cagion di quella (Book 5, XVIII)

Beltà poi che t'assenti (Book 6, II)

It was composed to commemorate the 400th anniversary of Gesualdo's birth and was intended to complement Stravinsky's similar Tres Sacrae Cantiones. It was premiered on September 27, 1960, at the Venice Biennale, played by the Orchestra del Teatro la Fenice conducted by Stravinsky.

The piece was later choreographed by the New York City Ballet (NYCB) co-founder and balletmaster George Balanchine. The premiere took place on Wednesday, November 16, 1960, at City Center of Music and Drama, New York, with scenery and lighting by David Hays (new lighting by Ronald Bates in 1974; current production's lighting by Mark Stanley).

It was first performed in conjunction with Balanchine's choreographic interpretation of Movements for Piano and Orchestra in 1963 and was regularly performed in this pairing thereafter.

References

Cited source

White, Eric Walter (1979). Stravinsky: The Composer and his Works (2nd ed.). University of California Press. ISBN 978-0520039834.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Monumentum pro Gesualdo” is ballet by George Balanchine. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Monumentum, Gesualdo and ballet, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewBest approached as a cultural-object dossier: authorship and date matter, but circulation and reception often explain the wider significance. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1960, 1974, 1963, 1979—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Monumentum, Gesualdo and ballet is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “ballet by George Balanchine” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Object files, edition statements, performance records and contemporary criticism preserve different stages of the work’s history. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 29, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3323503. VIAF identifies the subject as 176564766. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1960, 1974, 1963 and 1979.

Critical limits

Titles can refer to several editions, objects or performances, making precise identification essential before interpretation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Separate the work, its editions or performances, and its later reception. Catalogue records, publication histories and object files often preserve different parts of that story.

Best used for
  • Identifying works and editions
  • Tracing reception history
  • Finding collection records
Verify next

The original object or edition, catalogue raisonné, performance record, rights file and holding institution.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Monumentum pro Gesualdo”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Monumentum pro Gesualdo primary sources, Monumentum pro Gesualdo archive and Monumentum research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Monumentum pro Gesualdo”?
  2. How did later circulation or interpretation alter the work’s reception?
  3. Which edition, object, performance or recording is being described?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Monumentum pro Gesualdo” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.