CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

M–sigma relation

Relationship between the stellar mass dispersion of a galaxy bulge and the mass of the supermassive black hole at its center

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 21, 2026
Entity authorityQ3424023 ↗
Source-derived summary

The M–sigma (or M–σ) relation is an empirical correlation between the stellar velocity dispersion σ of a galaxy bulge and the mass M of the supermassive black hole at its center.

The M–σ relation was first presented in 1999 during a conference at the Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris in France by David Merritt. Merritt's proposed form of the relation, which he called the "Faber–Jackson law for black holes", was

M

10

8

M

⊙

≈

3.1

(

σ

200

k

m

s

−

1

)

4

.

{\displaystyle {\frac {M}{10^{8}M_{\odot }}}\approx 3.1\left({\frac {\sigma }{200~{\rm {km}}~{\rm {s}}^{-1}}}\right)^{4}.}

where

M

⊙

{\displaystyle M_{\odot }}

is the solar mass. Publication of the relation in a refereed journal, by two groups, took place the following year.

One of many recent studies, based on the growing sample of published black hole masses in nearby galaxies, gives

M

10

8

M

⊙

≈

1.9

(

σ

200

k

m

s

−

1

)

5.1

.

{\displaystyle {\frac {M}{10^{8}M_{\odot }}}\approx 1.9\left({\frac {\sigma }{200~{\rm {km}}~{\rm {s}}^{-1}}}\right)^{5.1}.}

Earlier work demonstrated a relationship between galaxy luminosity and black hole mass, which nowadays has a comparable level of scatter. The M–σ relation is generally interpreted as implying some source of mechanical feedback between the growth of supermassive black holes and the growth of galaxy bulges, although the source of this feedback is still uncertain.

Discovery of the M–σ relation was taken by many astronomers to imply that supermassive black holes are fundamental components of galaxies. Prior to about 2000, the main concern had been the simple detection of black holes, while afterward the interest changed to understanding the role of supermassive black holes as a critical component of galaxies.

Editorial summary

“M–sigma relation” enters the record as relationship between the stellar mass dispersion of a galaxy bulge and the mass of the supermassive black hole at its center. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what sigma, relation and Relationship can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1999, 2000—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around sigma, relation and Relationship.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“M–sigma relation” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, sigma, relation and Relationship provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 21, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3424023. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1999 and 2000.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “M–sigma relation”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow M–sigma relation primary sources, M–sigma relation archive and sigma research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “M–sigma relation”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “M–sigma relation” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.