CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

MAXEkSAT

Open-knowledge reference entry

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 9, 2026
Entity authorityQ6714607
Source-derived summary

MAXEkSAT is a problem in computational complexity theory that is a maximization version of the Boolean satisfiability problem 3SAT. In MAXEkSAT, each clause has exactly k literals, each with distinct variables, and is in conjunctive normal form. These are called k-CNF formulas. The problem is to determine the maximum number of clauses that can be satisfied by a truth assignment to the variables in the clauses.

We say that an algorithm A provides an α-approximation to MAXEkSAT if, for some fixed positive α less than or equal to 1, and every kCNF formula φ, A can find a truth assignment to the variables of φ that will satisfy at least an α-fraction of the maximum number of satisfiable clauses of φ.

Because the NP-hard k-SAT problem (for k ≥ 3) is equivalent to determining if the corresponding MAXEkSAT instance has a value equal to the number of clauses, MAXEkSAT must also be NP-hard, meaning that there is no polynomial time algorithm unless P=NP. A natural next question, then, is that of finding approximate solutions: what's the largest real number α < 1 such that some explicit P (complexity) algorithm always finds a solution of size α·OPT, where OPT is the (potentially hard to find) maximizing assignment. While the algorithm is efficient, it's not obvious how to remove its dependence on randomness. There are problems related to the satisfiability of conjunctive normal form Boolean formulas.

Approximation Algorithm

There is a simple randomized polynomial-time algorithm that provides a

(

1

1

2

k

)

{\displaystyle \textstyle \left(1-{\frac {1}{2^{k}}}\right)}

-approximation to MAXEkSAT: independently set each variable to true with probability ⁠1/2⁠, otherwise set it to false.

Any given clause c is unsatisfied only if all of its k constituent literals evaluates to false. Because each literal within a clause has a 1⁄2 chance of evaluating to true independently of any of the truth value of any of the other literals, the probability that they are all false is

(

1

2

)

k

=

1

2

k

{\displaystyle \textstyle ({\frac {1}{2}})^{k}={\frac {1}{2^{k}}}}

.

Editorial summary

“MAXEkSAT” enters the record as open-knowledge reference entry. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what MAXEkSAT, Open-knowledge and entry can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current 341-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around MAXEkSAT, Open-knowledge and entry.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“MAXEkSAT” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, MAXEkSAT, Open-knowledge and entry provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 9, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q6714607. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “MAXEkSAT”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow MAXEkSAT primary sources, MAXEkSAT archive and MAXEkSAT research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “MAXEkSAT”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from MAXEkSAT” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.