M82 X-1
suspected black hole
M82 X-1 is an ultra-luminous X-ray source located in the galaxy M82. It is a candidate intermediate-mass black hole, with the exact mass estimate varying from around 100 to 1000 solar masses. One of the most luminous ULXs ever known, its luminosity exceeds the Eddington limit for a stellar mass object.
In 2003 Strohmayer and Mushotzky used data from the XMM Newton Satellite to determine that M82 X-1 had a 54 mHz periodic x-ray signal, revealing that X-1 could be an intermediate-mass black hole. Then from 2004 to 2010 NASA's Rossi X-Ray Timing Explorer (RXTE) gathered about 800 observations of X-1. Using the gathered data, in August of 2014 Dheeraj Pasham, Strohmayer, and Mushotzky published an article that stated their mass estimates for X-1 to be 428 ± 105, which is the most accurate estimation we have.
Due to both objects being located in M82 and both objects being part of binary systems (or possibly being in one), it could be confused that M82 X-1 and M82 X-2 are part of the same binary systems. This is not the case however, as even though they are only about 5 arcseconds apart in the sky and are often studied together, they are part of two completely separate systems.
See also
M82 X-2
References
External links
Dying Star Reveals More Evidence for New Kind of Black Hole Archived 2021-11-20 at the Wayback Machine
A medium-sized black hole?
The public source identifies “M82 X-1” as suspected black hole. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around suspected, black and hole.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “M82 X-1”, the useful work is to connect “suspected black hole” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 21, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q2759979. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1000, 2003, 2004 and 2010.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “M82 X-1”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow M82 X-1 primary sources, M82 X-1 archive and suspected research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “M82 X-1”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “M82 X-1” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.