CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Lysibody

Open-knowledge reference entry

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 20, 2026
Entity authorityQ48996086
Source-derived summary

Although cell wall carbohydrates are ideal immunotherapeutic targets due to their abundance in bacteria and high level of conservation, their poor immunogenicity compared with protein targets complicates their use for the development of protective antibodies. A lysibody is a chimeric antibody in which the Fab region is the binding domain from a bacteriophage lysin, or the binding domain from an autolysin or bacteriocin, all of which bind to bacterial cell wall carbohydrate epitopes. This is linked to the Fc of Immunoglobulin G (IgG). The chimera forms a stable homodimer held together by hinge-region disulfide bonds. Thus, lysibodies are homodimeric hybrid immunoglobulin G molecules that can bind with high affinity and specificity to a carbohydrate substrate in the bacterial cell wall peptidoglycan. Lysibodies behave like authentic IgG by binding at high affinity to their bacterial wall receptor, fix complement and therefore promote phagocytosis by macrophages and neutrophils, protecting mice from infection in model systems. Since cell wall hydrolases, autolysins and bacteriocins are ubiquitous in nature, production of lysibodies specific for difficult to treat pathogenic bacteria is possible.

Binding domains may be linked to either the N-terminus of the IgG Fc (as is the case for autolysins) or to the C-terminus (as seen with phage lysins - see figure). In both cases the binding domains are able to bind their substrates in the bacterial cell wall and the Fc is able to perform its effector functions (see ref 2 for more detail).

Lysibodies may be used prophylactically to help protect surgical patients from bacterial infections, particularly methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and boost immune clearance in infected individuals.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Lysibody” is open-knowledge reference entry. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Lysibody, Open-knowledge and entry, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current 266-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Lysibody, Open-knowledge and entry is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “open-knowledge reference entry” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 20, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q48996086. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Lysibody”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Lysibody primary sources, Lysibody archive and Lysibody research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Lysibody”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Lysibody” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.