CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Lydie Vanhille

French tennis player

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionDec 13, 2024
Entity authorityQ110470550 ↗
Source-derived summary

Lydie Vanhille (born 23 April 1967) is a French former professional tennis player.

Vanhille, who had a best singles world ranking of 231, featured as a wildcard in the singles main draw of the 1987 French Open. She won her first round match over Alexia Dechaume, then lost in the second round to Petra Huber.

Editorial summary

“Lydie Vanhille” enters the record as french tennis player. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Lydie, Vanhille and French can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewStrongest as a route into the people, institutions and dated events that shaped the subject’s public record. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1967, 1987—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Lydie, Vanhille and French.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Lydie Vanhille” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Lydie, Vanhille and French provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Chronology provides the most reliable spine for this subject; interpretation should follow only after identities and dates are secure. The source revision retrieved here is dated Dec 13, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q110470550. The first chronological checks are 1967 and 1987.

Critical limits

Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Lydie Vanhille”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Lydie Vanhille primary sources, Lydie Vanhille archive and Lydie research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Lydie Vanhille”?
  2. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
  3. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Lydie Vanhille” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.