Lydia Daphine Mirembe
Ugandan politician
Daphine Lydia Mirembe (born 14 August 1985) is a Ugandan politician. She is the district women's representative for Butambala District in the Parliament of Uganda. She won the seat in parliament in 2016 on an independent ticket after defeating Aisha Kabanda of the National resistance movement (NRM) at the 2016 Ugandan general elections.
Education
Mirembe attended Kibibi secondary school for her 'O' level and 'A' level education. She attained her Uganda Certificate of Education in 2002 and Uganda Advanced Certificate of Education in 2004. She later joined the Makerere University Business School where she graduated with a Bachelor in Leisure and Hospitality Management in 2009.
Career
Mirembe is currently a member of parliament representing Butambala district as the district woman representative, a position she has held since 2016. In parliament, she serves on the committee on HIV/AIDS related disease and the committee on health. She is also a member of the Uganda Women Parliamentary Association where she serves on the sexual offences bill round table committee. She is also a member of the Buganda caucus in the parliament.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Lydia Daphine Mirembe” as ugandan politician. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the people & ideas register because the source frames it as ugandan politician. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
The entry’s evidential value lies in the named roles, institutions and publications that can be tested against primary documentation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 6, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q62129269. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1985, 2016, 2002 and 2004.
Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.
- Establishing names and roles
- Building a first chronology
- Locating cited institutions
Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Lydia Daphine Mirembe”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Lydia Daphine Mirembe primary sources, Lydia Daphine Mirembe archive and Lydia research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Lydia Daphine Mirembe”?
- Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
- How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Lydia Daphine Mirembe” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.