CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Lydia Byam

botanical illustrator (1772-1854)

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 5, 2026
Entity authorityQ66813067
Source-derived summary

Lydia Byam Sutton (baptised 1772 – 28 January 1854) was a British botanical illustrator known for her works depicting plants from the Caribbean. Byam's career flourished during the period between 1797 and 1800. She published two works A collection of exotics, from the Island of Antigua (1797) and Fruits of the West Indies (1800) respectively. These are important for the role they played in garnering interest in botany of the Caribbean islands and the dietary and medicinal benefits they offered.

Early life, family and education

Lydia Byam was born to parents William Byam and Martha Rogers (daughter of Edward Rogers). She was baptised on September 4, 1772, in Antigua. Her father was a lawyer and member of the Privy Council in Antigua, who died and was buried in St. Georges, Antigua in 1779. Through her father she was a great granddaughter of Edward Byam (c. 1664-1741), Governor of the Leeward Islands in 1715 and Lieutenant Governor of Antigua from 1715 until his death in 1741.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Lydia Byam” as botanical illustrator (1772-1854). Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewUseful for establishing the present vocabulary of the subject while preserving a route back to the evidence on which that vocabulary rests. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1772, 1854, 1797, 1800—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1750. The account is most persuasive where Lydia, Byam and botanical can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the science & nature register because the source frames it as botanical illustrator (1772-1854). Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 5, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q66813067. VIAF identifies the subject as 39273922. The Library of Congress control number is nr96008696. 1 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1772, 1854, 1797 and 1800.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Lydia Byam”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Lydia Byam primary sources, Lydia Byam archive and Lydia research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Lydia Byam”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Lydia Byam” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.