CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Lyclene

genus of insects

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 14, 2024
Entity authorityQ6707318 ↗
Source-derived summary

Lyclene is a genus of lichen moths of the family Erebidae, subfamily Arctiinae. The genus was erected by Frederic Moore in 1860.

Taxonomy

The genus is closely allied to Asura or Barsine and various of species are alternatively placed under these genera.

Species

Formerly placed here

References

Cerny, Karek & Pinratana, Amnuay (December 2009). Moths of Thailand. Vol. 6 Arctiidae. Brothers of St. Gabriel in Thailand.

Dubatolov, V. V. & Bucsek, K. (2013).

Editorial summary

“Lyclene” enters the record as genus of insects. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Lyclene, genus and insects can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewUseful for establishing the present vocabulary of the subject while preserving a route back to the evidence on which that vocabulary rests. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1860, 2009, 2013—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Lyclene, genus and insects.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Lyclene” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Lyclene, genus and insects provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 14, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q6707318. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1860, 2009 and 2013.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Lyclene”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Lyclene primary sources, Lyclene archive and Lyclene research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Lyclene”?
  2. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Lyclene” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.