CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

Luxembourg at the 1928 Summer Olympics

sporting event delegation

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 1, 2026
Entity authorityQ144877 ↗
Source-derived summary

Luxembourg competed at the 1928 Summer Olympics in Amsterdam, Netherlands. 48 competitors, 46 men and 2 women, took part in 31 events in 10 sports.

Athletics

Boxing

Men's Flyweight (– 50.8 kg)

Jean Kieffer

First Round – Lost to Alfredo Gaona (MEX), points

Cycling

Four cyclists represented Luxembourg in 1928.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Luxembourg at the 1928 Summer Olympics” as sporting event delegation. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Luxembourg, Summer and Olympics.

Editorial reviewA strong contextual entry point for chronology, institutions and public events when official records are distinguished from later interpretation. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1928—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Luxembourg, Summer and Olympics providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Luxembourg at the 1928 Summer Olympics”, the useful work is to connect “sporting event delegation” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The record creator and administrative purpose are central evidence, because official documentation reflects both action and institutional priorities. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 1, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q144877. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1928.

Critical limits

Official terminology may obscure informal participation, dissent or communities documented only indirectly. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Luxembourg at the 1928 Summer Olympics”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Luxembourg at the 1928 Summer Olympics primary sources, Luxembourg at the 1928 Summer Olympics archive and Luxembourg research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Luxembourg at the 1928 Summer Olympics”?
  2. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
  3. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Luxembourg at the 1928 Summer Olympics” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.