CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Benjamin Lund

association football player

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 3, 2026
Entity authorityQ27064110 ↗
Source-derived summary

Benjamin Christian Lynge Lund (born 12 March 1997) is a Danish footballer who plays as a left-back for Copenhagen Series club NB Bornholm.

Youth career

Born and raised in Rønne, Bornholm, Lund started playing football at the age of 3 at local club Knudsker IF. Lund did later also play for Rønne IK, before moving to FC Nordsjælland.

Club career

FC Nordsjælland

Lund signed a professional contract with Nordsjælland on July 6, 2016, and was promoted to the first team squad at the age of 19.

He got his official debut on August 14, 2016. Lund played the whole match in a 1–3 defeat against OB in the Danish Superliga. Lund's contract expired in the summer 2017, and he didn't get it extended due to the limited playing time. He began training with Viborg FF and Vendsyssel FF after he left FC Nordsjælland.

Vendsyssel FF

On 13 July 2017 it was announced, that Lund had signed with Vendsyssel FF.

Lund was loaned out to Thisted FC in the Danish 1st Division on 14 January 2019 due to the lack of playing time at Vendsyssel FF. Lund played the first three games of 2019, before he was diagnosed with mononucleosis. He said to the medias, that he would be out for an unknown period of time.

On transfer deadline day, 2 September 2019, Lund was loaned out again, this time to Danish 2nd Division club B.93 for the 2019/20 season.

Editorial summary

“Benjamin Lund” enters the record as association football player. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Benjamin, Lund and association can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewStrongest as a route into the people, institutions and dated events that shaped the subject’s public record. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1997, 2016, 2017, 2019—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1997-03-12. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Benjamin, Lund and association.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Benjamin Lund” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Benjamin, Lund and association provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Biographical claims are most persuasive when dates, appointments and relationships can be traced to records created close to the events described. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 3, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q27064110. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1997, 2016, 2017 and 2019.

Critical limits

A concise life account rarely captures disputed attribution, private networks or the changing language used to describe a career. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Benjamin Lund”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Benjamin Lund primary sources, Benjamin Lund archive and Benjamin research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Benjamin Lund”?
  2. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
  3. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Benjamin Lund” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.