CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Lummy Graham

New Zealand rugby league footballer

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 12, 2026
Entity authorityQ6703376
Source-derived summary

Lummy Graham is a New Zealand former rugby league footballer who represented New Zealand in the 1970 World Cup.

Playing career

Graham played for the Manukau Magpies in the Auckland Rugby League competition and also represented Auckland. In 1970 he was selected for the New Zealand national rugby league team and played three matches from the bench at the 1970 World Cup.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Lummy Graham” is new Zealand rugby league footballer. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Lummy, Graham and Zealand, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA useful biographical orientation record, particularly for establishing names, roles and a first chronology. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1970—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Lummy, Graham and Zealand is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “new Zealand rugby league footballer” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Biographical claims are most persuasive when dates, appointments and relationships can be traced to records created close to the events described. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 12, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q6703376. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1970.

Critical limits

Later biographies can compress uncertainty and repeat inherited reputations, so apparently settled claims may still require comparison. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Lummy Graham”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Lummy Graham primary sources, Lummy Graham archive and Lummy research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Lummy Graham”?
  2. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
  3. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Lummy Graham” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.