Lully, Fribourg
municipality in the canton of Fribourg, Switzerland
Lully (French pronunciation: [lyli]; Arpitan: Lulyi) is a municipality in the district of Broye, in the canton of Fribourg, Switzerland. On 1 January 2006 Lully incorporated the formerly independent municipalities of Bollion and Seiry as a result of boundary changes by the cantonal authorities.
History
Lully is first mentioned in 1011 as in villa Lulliaco.
Geography
Lully has an area, as of 2009, of 5.5 square kilometers (2.1 mi2). Of this area, 3.66 km2 (1.41 mi2) or 66.5% is used for agricultural purposes, while 1.12 km2 (0.43 mi2) or 20.4% is forested. Of the rest of the land, 0.69 km2 (0.27 mi2) or 12.5% is settled (buildings or roads), 0.01 km2 (2.5 acres) or 0.2% is either rivers or lakes.
Of the built up area, housing and buildings made up 4.2% and transportation infrastructure made up 7.3%. Out of the forested land, 18.7% of the total land area is heavily forested and 1.6% is covered with orchards or small clusters of trees. Of the agricultural land, 43.3% is used for growing crops and 19.5% is pastures, while 3.8% is used for orchards or vine crops. All the water in the municipality is flowing water.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Lully, Fribourg” is municipality in the canton of Fribourg, Switzerland. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Lully, Fribourg and municipality, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “municipality in the canton of Fribourg, Switzerland” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 15, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q70493. VIAF identifies the subject as 10144782698623761199. Authority coordinates are 46.833, 6.845. 2 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2006, 1011 and 2009.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Lully, Fribourg”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Lully, Fribourg primary sources, Lully, Fribourg archive and Lully research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Lully, Fribourg”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Lully, Fribourg” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.