CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Places & Architecture

Lukasashi River

river in Zambia

Architectural plans, a scale model, maps and brass measuring instruments
Places and architectureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 23, 2025
Entity authorityQ624606 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Lukasashi River (also spelled Lukusashi) is a tributary of the Lunsemfwa River in Zambia. It flows through important game conservation areas along its course.

Its coordinates are 14°39'0" S and 30°1'0" E in DMS (Degrees Minutes Seconds) or -14.65 and 30.0167 (in decimal degrees). Its UTM position is SJ77 and its Joint Operation Graphics reference is SD36-09.

The standard time zone for Lukasashi River is UTC/GMT+2.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Lukasashi River” as river in Zambia. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Lukasashi, River and river.

Editorial reviewA strong orientation record where physical form, institutional use and historical geography need to be read together. The current 67-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Lukasashi, River and river providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Lukasashi River”, the useful work is to connect “river in Zambia” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Place names and jurisdictional language are key evidence: both can reveal earlier catalogue descriptions and overlooked record series. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 23, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q624606.

Critical limits

Architectural summaries often privilege surviving fabric and can understate demolished phases, contested use or displaced communities. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Treat names, boundaries and functions as historically changeable. Maps, plans, inventories and administrative records can clarify what the place meant at different dates.

Best used for
  • Historic place names
  • Jurisdictional context
  • Routes into maps and plans
Verify next

Contemporary maps, plans, listed-building records, estate papers and the responsible local or national archive.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Lukasashi River”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Lukasashi River primary sources, Lukasashi River archive and Lukasashi research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Lukasashi River”?
  2. Which authority defined the place, boundary or structure at the relevant date?
  3. Which earlier names or jurisdictions may reveal additional records?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Lukasashi River” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.