CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Luka Lakvekheliani

Georgian association football player

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 4, 2026
Entity authorityQ99671063 ↗
Source-derived summary

Luka Lakvekheliani (born 20 October 1998) is a Georgian professional footballer who plays as a left-back for Erovnuli Liga club Dinamo Batumi.

Lakvekheliani is the league champion and cup winner with Saburtalo. Individually, he has received the Aleksandre Chivadze golden medal as U19 Player of the Year.

Career

A product of Saburtalo's academy, Lakvekheliani spent five league seasons in Georgia's top division. Apart from becoming a champion and cup winner with Saburtalo, he was named as U19 Player of the Year by the Georgian Football Federation.

In August 2020, Lakvekheliani signed a three-year deal with Hungarian side Mezőkövesd. He returned to Georgia to join champions Dinamo Tbilisi in March 2023 and added two more trophies to his tally during this season.

The player spent half of the 2024 season at Kolkheti 1913 before moving to Gagra.

In January 2025, Lakvekheliani signed for Dinamo Batumi.

International

Lakvekheliani was a member of the national youth teams.

Editorial summary

“Luka Lakvekheliani” enters the record as georgian association football player. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Luka, Lakvekheliani and Georgian can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewStrongest as a route into the people, institutions and dated events that shaped the subject’s public record. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1998, 2020, 2023, 2024—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1998-10-20. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Luka, Lakvekheliani and Georgian.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Luka Lakvekheliani” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Luka, Lakvekheliani and Georgian provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The entry’s evidential value lies in the named roles, institutions and publications that can be tested against primary documentation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 4, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q99671063. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1998, 2020, 2023 and 2024.

Critical limits

Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Luka Lakvekheliani”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Luka Lakvekheliani primary sources, Luka Lakvekheliani archive and Luka research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Luka Lakvekheliani”?
  2. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
  3. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Luka Lakvekheliani” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.