CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Luciana Servo

researcher

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionNov 8, 2025
Entity authorityQ96646752 ↗
Source-derived summary

Luciana Mendes Santos Servo is a Brazilian economist and researcher. Servo has been the President of the Institute of Applied Economic Research (IPEA) since February 2023 when she was appointed by the Minister of Planning Simone Tebet.

Early career

Servo received a doctorate in economics from the Federal University of Minas Gerais and a masters in economics from the University of São Paulo.

Servo began working at IPEA in 1998 and has participated largely in studies of health policy, coauthoring reports by the Council for Monitoring and Evaluation of Public Policies (CMAP) which evaluated hospital bed and ventilator availability during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil.

President of IPEA

Servo is the third woman and first Black person to lead IPEA.

Nomination

Servo was announced as President of IPEA on January 20, 2023, and was inaugurated on February 15, 2023.

Servo's nomination came after a controversy with Simone Tebet where she said that in the Ministry of Planning, she " want[s] not only to have women, but black women. And we know, regrettably, that black women are usually the breadwinners of the family. Bringing people from outside Brasilia is very difficult because wages are very low."

Tebet was criticized by Anielle Franco, the Minister of Racial Equality, who offered a list of black economists to work for Tebet. From this list, Tebet chose Servo.

Inauguration

Her inauguration was attended by Tebet and the Minister of Management Esther Dweck.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Luciana Servo” as researcher. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Luciana, Servo and researcher.

Editorial reviewStrongest as a route into the people, institutions and dated events that shaped the subject’s public record. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2023, 1998—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Luciana, Servo and researcher providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Luciana Servo”, the useful work is to connect “researcher” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The entry’s evidential value lies in the named roles, institutions and publications that can be tested against primary documentation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 8, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q96646752. VIAF identifies the subject as 192000496. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2023 and 1998.

Critical limits

Later biographies can compress uncertainty and repeat inherited reputations, so apparently settled claims may still require comparison. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Luciana Servo”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Luciana Servo primary sources, Luciana Servo archive and Luciana research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Luciana Servo”?
  2. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
  3. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Luciana Servo” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.