CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Laidback Luke

Dutch DJ and record producer

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 25, 2026
Entity authorityQ552902 ↗
Source-derived summary

Lucas Cornelis van Scheppingen (born 22 October 1976), better known under his stage name Laidback Luke, is a Filipino-born Dutch DJ and record producer. He is the founder of Mixmash Records and is widely credited as a key figure in the rise of electro house and Dutch house music in the late 2000s. He has collaborated with artists including Swedish House Mafia, Steve Aoki, David Guetta, and James Brown, and has remixed recordings by Madonna, Mariah Carey, Nicki Minaj, Daft Punk, and Depeche Mode, among others.

Early life

Lucas van Scheppingen was born to a Dutch father, Kees van Scheppingen, and a Filipina mother, Lucy Baruelo, in Manila, Philippines. The family relocated to the Netherlands during his childhood, and he grew up in Hoofddorp, a town in the North Holland province, together with his younger brother, Asley. He has credited his musical cousins in the Philippines, John Mark, Joseph, and Jed, as early influences on his love of music.

As a teenager, Luke developed parallel interests in graffiti art, martial arts, and electronic music. His introduction to club music came through a school dance, after which he became fascinated with the mechanics of DJing and music production. A friend who owned an Amiga computer introduced him to sampling and music software, sparking his interest in production. He invested in a synthesizer and began crafting his own tracks, drawing early inspiration from Chicago house's hard-charging rhythms and the funky hard techno sound emerging from Europe at the time.

Editorial summary

“Laidback Luke” enters the record as dutch DJ and record producer. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Laidback, Luke and Dutch can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1976—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1976-10-22. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Laidback, Luke and Dutch.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Laidback Luke” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Laidback, Luke and Dutch provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 25, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q552902. VIAF identifies the subject as 80050420. The Library of Congress control number is no2012119161. 4 of 4 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1976.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Laidback Luke”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Laidback Luke primary sources, Laidback Luke archive and Laidback research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Laidback Luke”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Laidback Luke” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.