Lost Dauphin Park
park in Brown Country, Wisconsin

Lost Dauphin State Park is a former state park in Brown County, Wisconsin. It is located on land that was held for six decades by Mary Hobart Williams (née "Marie Madeline Jourdain"), a French-Menominee Métis woman whose story was buried inside the archive of the man who married her when she was fourteen.
The Land
The land on the Fox River was given to Marie Madeline Jourdain by her Menominee relatives as dowry. She would hold it from the 1820s until her death in the 1880s—through the era of Indian removal, the Civil War, and Wounded Knee.
The Marriage
In 1823, Jourdain—then fourteen years old—was married by her teacher, Episcopal missionary Eleazer Williams, who was in his thirties.
Contemporary accounts noted she was “not a willing party to the contract.” Williams used the marriage to strengthen his claim to her land at Little Rapids. He spent most of their marriage away from home, pursuing his plan to build an “Indian empire” with himself as leader, mortgaging her land without her consent, and later claiming to be the Lost Dauphin of France. He died in poverty in New York in 1858, having never successfully claimed what was hers.
The Woman Who Held the Land
After Williams’ death, Mary Hobart Williams (as she had been renamed by the Episcopal Church) remained on the land. She built a matriarchal household with her adopted daughter Josephine and Josephine’s Menominee birth mother.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Lost Dauphin Park” is park in Brown Country, Wisconsin. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Lost, Dauphin and Park, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “park in Brown Country, Wisconsin” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Maps, plans, fabric surveys and administrative records can establish how the site’s name, extent and function changed over time. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 20, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q43371124. Authority coordinates are 44.389, -88.127. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1823 and 1858.
Modern boundaries and familiar names can conceal earlier jurisdictions or structures that do not align with the present site. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Treat names, boundaries and functions as historically changeable. Maps, plans, inventories and administrative records can clarify what the place meant at different dates.
- Historic place names
- Jurisdictional context
- Routes into maps and plans
Contemporary maps, plans, listed-building records, estate papers and the responsible local or national archive.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Lost Dauphin Park”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Lost Dauphin Park primary sources, Lost Dauphin Park archive and Lost research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Lost Dauphin Park”?
- What physical evidence or contemporary plan supports the description?
- Which authority defined the place, boundary or structure at the relevant date?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Lost Dauphin Park” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.