CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Loop de Loop

1962 single by Johnny Thunder

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 25, 2026
Entity authorityQ62586291
Source-derived summary

"Loop de Loop" is a song written by Teddy Vann and Joe Dong and performed by Johnny Thunder featuring The Bobbettes. It reached No. 4 on the U.S. pop chart and No. 6 on the U.S. R&B chart in 1963. It was featured on his 1963 album Loop De Loop. In Canada it reached No. 14 in 2 separate weeks.

The recording was produced by Teddy Vann, and it was Thunder's only Top 40 hit. The chorus is taken almost in whole from the popular folk song or children's song, known by various names, including "Here we go Loop de Loop."

Other charting versions

Frankie Vaughan released the song as a single in 1963 which reached No. 5 on the UK Singles Chart, No.

Editorial summary

“Loop de Loop” enters the record as 1962 single by Johnny Thunder. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Loop, single and Johnny can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1963—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1962-01-01. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Loop, single and Johnny.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Loop de Loop” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Loop, single and Johnny provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 25, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q62586291. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1963.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Loop de Loop”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Loop de Loop primary sources, Loop de Loop archive and Loop research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Loop de Loop”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Loop de Loop” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.