Society for the Suppression of Mendicity
UK charity working to deal with begging in London (1818-1959)

The Society for the Suppression of Mendicity was a British charitable organisation, established as a joint-stock company in 1818 and operating until 1959. It aimed to deal with a supposed problem of begging in the streets of London, and begging by letter, by a range of measures including discouraging falsehood and imposture on the part of beggars; making inquiries into the circumstances of individual beggars and making interventions in their lives; and sponsoring the removal of beggars to parishes from which they were determined by the society to originate. It did not, at least in its stated aims, seek to diminish direct donations to beggars.
History
The impetus for the society came from William Bodkin, who advertised and organised a meeting on 5 January 1818 at which a determination to form the society was made, and who from its 25 March 1818 foundation date acted as honorary secretary until 1830. Bodkin also acted as "assistant manager" of the society's inquiry and relief office, at a salary of up to £300 per annum, plus bonuses.
M.J.D. Roberts notes two classes of early members of the society; father-figures - individuals already associated with the cause of dealing with beggars and who provided an imprimatur for the society, such as Matthew Martin, responsible for the establishment of the Bath Society for the Investigation and Relief of Occasional Distress; William Allen a Quaker well known for his work in schemes of social and penal improvement; and Patrick Colquhoun, founder of the first regular preventive police force in England; and then early enthusiasts such as Joseph Hume, David Ricardo, Charles Barclay, John Abel Smith, William Williams and William Sturges Bourne, all MPs, who allied themselves with the society in its earliest stages to further their interests in fostering moral self-discipline amongst the working population.
Perhaps arising from Joseph Hume's persuasion, Prince Frederick, Duke of York and Albany, second son of the monarch, George III, became patron of the society in its first year. Hugh Percy, 2nd Duke of Northumberland took office as president, and the society attracted a contingent of aristocrats as vice-presidents. For many years the society retained its royal connection; William IV, whilst still Duke of Clarence and St Andrews, took on his brother's role upon Frederick's death in 1827, and Queen Victoria replaced William on his death in 1837.
The society appears widely to have been recognised as filling a gap in the provision of charitable activity in London, and established a solid funding base of about 1,500 regular subscribers, and a larger set of casual donors, so that its annual revenue for the first ten years of operation was circa £3,000.
The public source identifies “Society for the Suppression of Mendicity” as uK charity working to deal with begging in London (1818-1959). This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Society, Suppression and Mendicity.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Society for the Suppression of Mendicity”, the useful work is to connect “uK charity working to deal with begging in London (1818-1959)” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 27, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q123011097. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1818, 1959, 1830 and 1827.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Society for the Suppression of Mendicity”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Society for the Suppression of Mendicity primary sources, Society for the Suppression of Mendicity archive and Society research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Society for the Suppression of Mendicity”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Society for the Suppression of Mendicity” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.