Logie Awards of 1992
Open-knowledge reference entry
The 34th Annual TV Week Logie Awards were presented on 13 March 1992, in a ceremony hosted by Steve Vizard at the Radisson President Hotel in Melbourne. The ceremony was broadcast on the Seven Network. Guests included John Stamos, Dennis Waterman, Bob Hawke and Campbell McComas. Miniseries Brides of Christ received the most awards (5), including both Most Popular and Most Outstanding Telemovie or Miniseries. Soap opera E Street received two wins from five nominations, while sketch comedy show Fast Forward won three awards from four nominations. Jana Wendt won the Gold Logie for A Current Affair and Four Corners was inducted into the Hall of Fame.
Nominees and winners
The nominations were published in the 7 March 1992 issue of TV Week. Winners are listed first and highlighted in bold.
National awards
Gold Logie
Acting and presenting
Most Popular Programs and videos
Most Outstanding Programs
State awards
Performers
Dannii Minogue
Matthew Krok
Ryan Clark
Naomi Tuckfield
Brooke Anderson
Nick Giannopoulos
Bruno Lucia
Cathy Godbold
Hall of Fame
After 40 years on Australian television, Four Corners became the ninth inductee into the TV Week Logie Logie Hall of Fame.
Gold Logie controversy
The ceremony ended in controversy when A Current Affair host Jana Wendt was not present to accept her Gold Logie.
The public source identifies “Logie Awards of 1992” as open-knowledge reference entry. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Logie, Awards and Open-knowledge.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Logie Awards of 1992”, the useful work is to connect “open-knowledge reference entry” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 22, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q6667573. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1992.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Logie Awards of 1992”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Logie Awards of 1992 primary sources, Logie Awards of 1992 archive and Logie research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Logie Awards of 1992”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Logie Awards of 1992” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.