CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Logical equality

logical operator in propositional calculus

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionFeb 7, 2026
Entity authorityQ3308477
Source-derived summary

Logical equality is a logical operator that compares two truth values, or more generally, two formulas, such that it gives the value True if both arguments have the same truth value, and False if they are different. In the case where formulas have free variables, we say two formulas are equal when their truth values are equal for all possible resolutions of free variables. It corresponds to equality in Boolean algebra and to the logical biconditional in propositional calculus.

It is customary practice in various applications, if not always technically precise, to indicate the operation of logical equality on the logical operands x and y by any of the following forms:

x

y

x

y

E

x

y

x

E

Q

y

x

=

y

{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}x&\leftrightarrow y&x&\Leftrightarrow y&\mathrm {E} xy\\x&\mathrm {~EQ~} y&x&=y\end{aligned}}}

Some logicians, however, draw a firm distinction between a functional form, like those in the left column, which they interpret as an application of a function to a pair of arguments — and thus a mere indication that the value of the compound expression depends on the values of the component expressions — and an equational form, like those in the right column, which they interpret as an assertion that the arguments have equal values, in other words, that the functional value of the compound expression is true.

Definition

Logical equality is an operation on two logical values, typically the values of two propositions, that produces a value of true if and only if both operands are false or both operands are true.

The truth table of p EQ q (also written as p = q, p ↔ q, Epq, p ≡ q, or p == q) is as follows:

Alternative descriptions

The form (x = y) is equivalent to the form (x ∧ y) ∨ (¬x ∧ ¬y).

(

x

=

y

)

=

¬

(

x

y

)

=

¬

x

y

=

x

¬

y

=

(

x

y

)

(

¬

x

¬

y

)

=

(

¬

x

y

)

(

x

¬

y

)

{\displaystyle (x=y)=\lnot (x\oplus y)=\lnot x\oplus y=x\oplus \lnot y=(x\land y)\lor (\lnot x\land \lnot y)=(\lnot x\lor y)\land (x\lor \lnot y)}

For the operands x and y, the truth table of the logical equality operator is as follows:

Inequality

In mathematics, the plus sign "+" almost invariably indicates an operation that satisfies the axioms assigned to addition in the type of algebraic structure that is known as a field. For Boolean algebra, this means that the logical operation signified by "+" is not the same as the inclusive disjunction signified by "∨" but is actually equivalent to the logical inequality operator signified by "≠", or what amounts to the same thing, the exclusive disjunction signified by "XOR" or "⊕". Naturally, these variations in usage have caused some failures to communicate between mathematicians and switching engineers over the years. At any rate, one has the following array of corresponding forms for the symbols associated with logical inequality:

x

+

y

x

y

J

x

y

x

X

O

R

y

x

y

{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}x&+y&x&\not \equiv y&Jxy\\x&\mathrm {~XOR~} y&x&\neq y\end{aligned}}}

This explains why "EQ" is often called "XNOR" in the combinational logic of circuit engineers, since it is the negation of the XOR operation; "NXOR" is a less commonly used alternative.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Logical equality” as logical operator in propositional calculus. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Logical, equality and logical.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current 562-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Logical, equality and logical providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Logical equality”, the useful work is to connect “logical operator in propositional calculus” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 7, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3308477. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Logical equality”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Logical equality primary sources, Logical equality archive and Logical research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Logical equality”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Logical equality” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.