CACrown ArchivesHistory · sources · collections
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Log–log plot

plot that uses logarithmic scales on both the horizontal and vertical axes

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 1, 2026
Entity authorityQ2091879
Source-derived summary

In science and engineering, a log–log graph or log–log plot is a two-dimensional graph of numerical data that uses logarithmic scales on both the horizontal and vertical axes. Power functions – relationships of the form

y

=

a

x

k

{\displaystyle y=ax^{k}}

– appear as straight lines in a log–log graph, with the exponent corresponding to the slope, and the coefficient corresponding to the intercept. Thus these graphs are very useful for recognizing these relationships and estimating parameters. Any base can be used for the logarithm, though most commonly base 10 (common logs) are used.

Relation with monomials

Given a monomial equation

y

=

a

x

k

,

{\displaystyle y=ax^{k},}

taking the logarithm of the equation (with any base) yields:

log

y

=

k

log

x

+

log

a

.

{\displaystyle \log y=k\log x+\log a.}

Setting

X

=

log

x

{\displaystyle X=\log x}

and

Y

=

log

y

,

{\displaystyle Y=\log y,}

which corresponds to using a log–log graph, yields the equation

Y

=

m

X

+

b

{\displaystyle Y=mX+b}

where m = k is the slope of the line (gradient) and b = log a is the intercept on the (log y)-axis, meaning where log x = 0, so, reversing the logs, a is the y value corresponding to x = 1.

Equations

The equation for a line on a log–log scale would be:

log

10

F

(

x

)

=

m

log

10

x

+

b

,

{\displaystyle \log _{10}F(x)=m\log _{10}x+b,}

F

(

x

)

=

x

m

10

b

,

{\displaystyle F(x)=x^{m}\cdot 10^{b},}

where m is the slope and b is the intercept point on the log plot.

Slope of a log–log plot

To find the slope of the plot, two points are selected on the x-axis, say x1 and x2. Using the below equation:

log

[

F

(

x

1

)

]

=

m

log

(

x

1

)

+

b

,

{\displaystyle \log[F(x_{1})]=m\log(x_{1})+b,}

and

log

[

F

(

x

2

)

]

=

m

log

(

x

2

)

+

b

.

{\displaystyle \log[F(x_{2})]=m\log(x_{2})+b.}

The slope m is found taking the difference:

m

=

log

(

F

2

)

log

(

F

1

)

log

(

x

2

)

log

(

x

1

)

=

log

(

F

2

/

F

1

)

log

(

x

2

/

x

1

)

,

{\displaystyle m={\frac {\log(F_{2})-\log(F_{1})}{\log(x_{2})-\log(x_{1})}}={\frac {\log(F_{2}/F_{1})}{\log(x_{2}/x_{1})}},}

where F1 is shorthand for F(x1) and F2 is shorthand for F(x2).

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Log–log plot” as plot that uses logarithmic scales on both the horizontal and vertical axes. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current 423-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where plot, uses and logarithmic can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as plot that uses logarithmic scales on both the horizontal and vertical axes. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 1, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q2091879. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Log–log plot”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Log–log plot primary sources, Log–log plot archive and plot research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Log–log plot”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Log–log plot” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.