Coherent sheaf
finite-type sheaf F of modules over a ringed space such that the kernel of a surjective morphism from a finite direct sum of the structure sheaf onto it is also of finite type

In mathematics, especially in algebraic geometry and the theory of complex manifolds, coherent sheaves are a class of sheaves closely linked to the geometric properties of the underlying space. The definition of coherent sheaves is made with reference to a sheaf of rings that codifies this geometric information.
Coherent sheaves can be seen as a generalization of vector bundles. Unlike vector bundles, they form an abelian category, and so they are closed under operations such as taking kernels, images, and cokernels. The quasi-coherent sheaves are a generalization of coherent sheaves and include the locally free sheaves of infinite rank.
Coherent sheaf cohomology is a powerful technique, in particular for studying the sections of a given coherent sheaf.
Definitions
A quasi-coherent sheaf on a ringed space
(
X
,
O
X
)
{\displaystyle (X,{\mathcal {O}}_{X})}
is a sheaf
F
{\displaystyle {\mathcal {F}}}
of
O
X
{\displaystyle {\mathcal {O}}_{X}}
-modules that has a local presentation, that is, every point in
X
{\displaystyle X}
has an open neighborhood
U
{\displaystyle U}
in which there is an exact sequence
O
X
⊕
I
|
U
→
O
X
⊕
J
|
U
→
F
|
U
→
0
{\displaystyle {\mathcal {O}}_{X}^{\oplus I}|_{U}\to {\mathcal {O}}_{X}^{\oplus J}|_{U}\to {\mathcal {F}}|_{U}\to 0}
for some (possibly infinite) sets
I
{\displaystyle I}
and
J
{\displaystyle J}
.
A coherent sheaf on a ringed space
(
X
,
O
X
)
{\displaystyle (X,{\mathcal {O}}_{X})}
is a sheaf
F
{\displaystyle {\mathcal {F}}}
of
O
X
{\displaystyle {\mathcal {O}}_{X}}
-modules satisfying the following two properties:
F
{\displaystyle {\mathcal {F}}}
is of finite type over
O
X
{\displaystyle {\mathcal {O}}_{X}}
, that is, every point in
X
{\displaystyle X}
has an open neighborhood
U
{\displaystyle U}
in
X
{\displaystyle X}
such that there is a surjective morphism
O
X
n
|
U
→
F
|
U
{\displaystyle {\mathcal {O}}_{X}^{n}|_{U}\to {\mathcal {F}}|_{U}}
for some natural number
n
{\displaystyle n}
;
for any open set
U
⊆
X
{\displaystyle U\subseteq X}
, any natural number
n
{\displaystyle n}
, and any morphism
φ
:
O
X
n
|
U
→
F
|
U
{\displaystyle \varphi :{\mathcal {O}}_{X}^{n}|_{U}\to {\mathcal {F}}|_{U}}
of
O
X
{\displaystyle {\mathcal {O}}_{X}}
-modules, the kernel of
φ
{\displaystyle \varphi }
is of finite type.
Morphisms between (quasi-)coherent sheaves are the same as morphisms of sheaves of
O
X
{\displaystyle {\mathcal {O}}_{X}}
-modules.
The case of schemes
When
X
{\displaystyle X}
is a scheme, the general definitions above are equivalent to more explicit ones.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Coherent sheaf” as finite-type sheaf F of modules over a ringed space such that the kernel of a surjective morphism from a finite direct sum of the structure sheaf onto it is also of finite type. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as finite-type sheaf F of modules over a ringed space such that the kernel of a surjective morphism from a finite direct sum of the structure sheaf onto it is also of finite type. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 13, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q906907. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Coherent sheaf”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Coherent sheaf primary sources, Coherent sheaf archive and Coherent research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Coherent sheaf”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Coherent sheaf” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.