CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Arctoparmelia incurva

species of fungus

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 12, 2026
Entity authorityQ10549579 ↗
Source-derived summary

Arctoparmelia incurva is a species of saxicolous (rock-dwelling), foliose lichen in the family Parmeliaceae. First described in 1794 by Christiaan Hendrik Persoon, it has undergone several taxonomic reclassifications before being placed in its current genus in 1986. This yellowish-green lichen, characterised by its narrow, convex lobes and globular soralia, typically grows on sun-exposed siliceous rocks in alpine and arctic habitats. It has a circumpolar distribution, found across North America, Europe, and parts of Asia. A. incurva can be distinguished from similar species by its specific morphological features and chemical spot test reactions. The lichen is known to host several parasitic fungi and has shown tolerance to acid pollution.

Taxonomy

It was first scientifically described as a new species in 1794 by Christiaan Hendrik Persoon. He classified it in the genus Lichen, as was the custom thanks to the influence of Carl Linnaeus. Following proposed transfers to various genera, including Lobaria, and the now-obsolete Imbricaria and Placodium, the taxon got transferred to Parmelia by Elias Magnus Fries in 1826. It remained in that genus for more than a century, when Mason Hale reclassified it in the large genus Xanthoparmelia in 1974.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Arctoparmelia incurva” as species of fungus. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewUseful for establishing the present vocabulary of the subject while preserving a route back to the evidence on which that vocabulary rests. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1794, 1986, 1826, 1974—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Arctoparmelia, incurva and species can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the science & nature register because the source frames it as species of fungus. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 12, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q10549579. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1794, 1986, 1826 and 1974.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Arctoparmelia incurva”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Arctoparmelia incurva primary sources, Arctoparmelia incurva archive and Arctoparmelia research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Arctoparmelia incurva”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Arctoparmelia incurva” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.