CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Siraitia grosvenorii

species of plant whose fruit extract is 300 times sweeter than sugar

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 18, 2026
Entity authorityQ1544966
Source-derived summary

Siraitia grosvenorii, commonly known as luohan fruit (Chinese: 羅漢果; pinyin: luóhàn guǒ "arhat fruit", also directly: luo han guo/kuo), monk fruit or swingle fruit is a herbaceous perennial vine of the gourd family, Cucurbitaceae, native to southern China.

The plant is cultivated for its fruit extract containing mogrosides. Mogroside extract has been used as a low-calorie sugar substitute for drinks and in traditional Chinese medicine. One mogroside classified as mogroside V produces a sweet-tasting sensation 250 times stronger than sucrose.

Etymology and regional names

In Buddhism, an arhat is a monk who has attained enlightenment, also described as one who has attained the "fruition of arhatship" (Sanskrit: arhattaphala); this thus was partially calqued as 羅漢果 luóhàn guǒ (plus rendered into Vietnamese as la hán quả), the Chinese name was adopted as the Western commercial designation for this fruit.

The genus name Siraitia was named by American botanist Elmer Drew Merrill for his colleague Sirait Sawek, a Thai botanist who collected specimens in Southeast Asia.

The species name grosvenorii honors Gilbert Hovey Grosvenor, who, as president of the National Geographic Society, helped to fund an expedition in the 1930s to find the living plant in China where it was already being cultivated.

History and distribution

Monk fruit was first mentioned in the 13th century off Chinese monastic records in Guangxi in the region of Guilin. The difficulty of cultivation meant the fruit did not become part of the Chinese herbal tradition which depended on more readily available products.

The first English botanical description of monk fruit was published in 1941 by Walter T. Swingle.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Siraitia grosvenorii” is species of plant whose fruit extract is 300 times sweeter than sugar. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Siraitia, grosvenorii and species, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewUseful for establishing the present vocabulary of the subject while preserving a route back to the evidence on which that vocabulary rests. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1941—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Siraitia, grosvenorii and species is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “species of plant whose fruit extract is 300 times sweeter than sugar” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 18, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1544966. The first chronological checks are 1941.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Siraitia grosvenorii”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Siraitia grosvenorii primary sources, Siraitia grosvenorii archive and Siraitia research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Siraitia grosvenorii”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Siraitia grosvenorii” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.