CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Places & Architecture

Ljubešćica

municipality and settlement in Varaždin County, Croatia

Architectural plans, a scale model, maps and brass measuring instruments
Places and architectureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 12, 2026
Entity authorityQ1027907 ↗
Source-derived summary

Ljubeščica is a village and municipality in Croatia in Varaždin County.

Population

In the 2011 census, there were a total of 1,858 inhabitants, in the following settlements:

Kapela Kalnička, population 268

Ljubelj, population 63

Ljubelj Kalnički, population 144

Ljubešćica, population 1,261

Rakovec, population 122

In the same census, 99% of the people were Croats.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Ljubešćica” as municipality and settlement in Varaždin County, Croatia. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Ljubešćica, municipality and settlement.

Editorial reviewA strong orientation record where physical form, institutional use and historical geography need to be read together. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2011—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Ljubešćica, municipality and settlement providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Ljubešćica”, the useful work is to connect “municipality and settlement in Varaždin County, Croatia” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The strongest evidence will usually combine a dated visual record with documents produced by the authority responsible for the place. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 12, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1027907. VIAF identifies the subject as 316747601. Authority coordinates are 46.167, 16.383. 3 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2011.

Critical limits

Modern boundaries and familiar names can conceal earlier jurisdictions or structures that do not align with the present site. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Treat names, boundaries and functions as historically changeable. Maps, plans, inventories and administrative records can clarify what the place meant at different dates.

Best used for
  • Historic place names
  • Jurisdictional context
  • Routes into maps and plans
Verify next

Contemporary maps, plans, listed-building records, estate papers and the responsible local or national archive.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Ljubešćica”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Ljubešćica primary sources, Ljubešćica archive and Ljubešćica research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Ljubešćica”?
  2. Which authority defined the place, boundary or structure at the relevant date?
  3. Which earlier names or jurisdictions may reveal additional records?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Ljubešćica” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.