CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Liwia

genus of arthropods (fossil)

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJan 15, 2026
Entity authorityQ6659925 ↗
Source-derived summary

Liwia is a genus of nektaspid of the family Liwiidae from the Early Cambrian. It includes the species Liwia plana and Liwia convexa, both known from borehole samples several kilometers in depth from the Zawiszyn Formation in Poland, which has also yielded Peytoia infercambriensis.

Discovery and naming

The holotype of fossil of Liwia was found from the Zawiszyn Formation of Poland. It was described in 1975.

The original generic name Livia is derived from the name of the Liwiec River, near to where the fossils were found, although as this generic name was already preoccupied, in 1988 it was changed to Liwia.

The specific name for L. convexa derives directly from the Latin word convexa, to mean "rounded", relating to the curved appearance of the pygidium; whilst the specific name for L. plana derives directly from the Latin word plana, to mean "flat", relating the overall flatness of this species.

Description

Liwia is a member of the order nektaspida, and the namesake of the Liwiidae family, growing to around 20–30 mm (0.8–1.2 in) in length, with the longer, incomplete species being L. convexa; and the shorter, more complete species being L. plana.

Liwia had an oval shaped cephalon, with four thoracic segments, and a distinctive spiked pygidium, which had six pairs of rear-facing spines, with the three anterior spines being shorter, whilst the three posterior spines are longer.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Liwia” as genus of arthropods (fossil). This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Liwia, genus and arthropods.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1975, 1988—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Liwia, genus and arthropods providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Liwia”, the useful work is to connect “genus of arthropods (fossil)” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 15, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q6659925. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1975 and 1988.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Liwia”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Liwia primary sources, Liwia archive and Liwia research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Liwia”?
  2. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Liwia” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.