CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Liverpool City (1906)

defunct English rugby league team

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionNov 24, 2023
Entity authorityQ6658338 ↗
Source-derived summary

Liverpool City was a semi-professional rugby league club. The club was based in the Stanley area of Liverpool, a metropolitan borough of Merseyside, England.

The club played in the Rugby League for only one season, in 1906–07.

History

The club played in the Rugby League for the single season 1906–07, its first match being a 41–8 defeat at home to Wigan on 3 September 1906, watched by 1,000 spectators; the club's two tries both scored by J. H. Cooper. The club finished in bottom place out of the 26 clubs (Pontefract had folded after only 8 games and their records were expunged, but even they had won 3 of these 8 matches). The team lost all 30 official league matches played. It did draw one game, at home to Bramley, which at the time had also lost all of its matches in the season; the match ended 3–3, the points coming from one try each; Dunbobbin going over for the Citizens. However, as the return fixture was cancelled, the first (drawn) fixture was expunged from the records.

The club resolved to continue in 1907–08 in the West Lancashire Rugby League, but it was unable to fulfil its fixture commitments, and was wound up in November 1907.

Another club, also called Liverpool City was formed in 1951 when Liverpool Stanley changed their name and location.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Liverpool City (1906)” as defunct English rugby league team. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Liverpool, City and defunct.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1906, 1907, 1951—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Liverpool, City and defunct providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Liverpool City (1906)”, the useful work is to connect “defunct English rugby league team” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 24, 2023. The linked authority identifier is Q6658338. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1906, 1907 and 1951.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Liverpool City (1906)”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Liverpool City (1906) primary sources, Liverpool City (1906) archive and Liverpool research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Liverpool City (1906)”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Liverpool City (1906)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.