Liu Zhanqi
Chinese police officer
Liu Zhanqi (simplified Chinese: 刘占琪; traditional Chinese: 劉佔琪; pinyin: Lií Zhànqí; born December 1956) is a former officer of the Chinese People's Armed Police. He was investigated by the Commission for Discipline Inspection of the Central Military Commission (CMCCDI) in November 2014 and his case was handed over to military prosecutors in May 2015. Previously he served as chief of the People's Armed Police transportation command.
Liu worked for a long time on logistics and infrastructure projects for the Chinese Armed Police, and he is the first provincial-level Armed Police official to be placed under investigation. On June 17, 2015, the Central Military Commission (CMC) announced in a brief notice that Kou Tie and Liu Zhanqi were placed under investigation in November and their cases forwarded to prosecutors last month. So far, 37 PLA officials of deputy corps level and above have been put under corruption probes since CMC Chairman Xi Jinping's continues an anti-graft dragnet at all levels of government, military and ruling Chinese Communist Party.
Biography
Liu was born in Dingzhou, Hebei in December 1956. He enlisted in the People's Armed Police in December 1973 by age 17, three years before the Cultural Revolution ended. Beginning in March 1980, he served in several posts in the Logistics Department of the People's Armed Police of Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, including administrative assistant, deputy director, and director. In September 1985 he entered Ürümqi Institute of Education, majoring in Chinese language and literature.
“Liu Zhanqi” enters the record as chinese police officer. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Zhanqi, Chinese and police can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Liu Zhanqi” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Zhanqi, Chinese and police provides the most credible route into that argument.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 18, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q22774227. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1956, 2014, 2015 and 1973.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Liu Zhanqi”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Liu Zhanqi primary sources, Liu Zhanqi archive and Zhanqi research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Liu Zhanqi”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Liu Zhanqi” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.