CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Lithobolia (festival)

ancient festival in Troezen for Damia and Auxesia

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 21, 2025
Entity authorityQ115708271 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Lithobolia (Ancient Greek: Λιθοβόλια) was an apotropaic festival of ancient Greece associated with the cults of the harvest goddesses Damia and Auxesia -- sometimes used interchangeably with Demeter and Persephone -- celebrated throughout the Saronic Gulf, but especially in Troezen, Aegina, and Epidauros.

According to tradition, there was a civil insurrection or riot of some sort in Troezen, during which two foreign women who'd traveled from Crete named Auxesia and Damia happened to wind up between two opposing parties and were stoned to death, after which the people of Troezen paid honors to the woman and instituted the festival of Lithobolia, which means "stoning" or "stone fight". The citizens of Troezen were possibly ashamed at having murdered foreign guests to their city, though scholars have observed that the bloodshed of innocent passersby feature in many harvest festivals.

The exact nature of the festival is unclear, but scholars believe it was a purification rite and consisted of a kind of ritual abuse, similar to other fertility cults. This likely consisted of symbolic or actual battles of stone-throwing between participants, and the exchange of vulgar, sexualized language. While there may or may not have been real bloodshed during the event, it seems related to the ancient belief that blood sacrifices pleased the Chthonic deities. It was a popular belief that blood sprinkled on the ground protected crops from the anger of the gods. Other scholars liken it to the ritualistic role of a scapegoat, in which the greater good is served by the death of one or a few. The cults of these deified women involved aischrologia (αἰσχρολογία) or "filthy language", which possibly also featured in the Lithobolia.

The festival lent its name to a 17th century folk tale, Lithobolia.

Editorial summary

“Lithobolia (festival)” enters the record as ancient festival in Troezen for Damia and Auxesia. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Lithobolia, festival and ancient can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current 289-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Lithobolia, festival and ancient.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Lithobolia (festival)” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Lithobolia, festival and ancient provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 21, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q115708271. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Lithobolia (festival)”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Lithobolia (festival) primary sources, Lithobolia (festival) archive and Lithobolia research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Lithobolia (festival)”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Lithobolia (festival)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.