CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Lists of languages

Wikimedia list of lists

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 13, 2026
Entity authorityQ3183574
Source-derived summary

This page is a list of lists of languages.

Published lists

SIL International's Ethnologue: Languages of the World lists over 7,100 spoken and signed languages.

The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) assigns codes for most languages; see ISO 639

List of ISO 639-1 codes – two-letter codes (184 major languages)

List of ISO 639-2 codes – three-letter codes

ISO 639 macrolanguage – ISO 639-2 codes used as ISO 639-3 codes

List of ISO 639-3 codes – three-letter codes, intended to "cover all known natural languages"

List of ISO 639-5 codes – three-letter codes for language families and groups

IETF language tag – depends on ISO 639, but provides various expansion mechanisms

Glottolog

Linguasphere Observatory (LS-2010, totaling over 32,800 coded entries and over 70,900 linguistic names)

English Wikipedia list articles

Index of language articles

Comprehensive lists

Lists which are global in scope (all living natural languages would classify for inclusion):

by country:

List of official languages by country and territory

Number of languages by country

by name: List of language names (native names)

by phylogenetic relation: List of language families (phylogenetic)

by primary language family: List of Afro-Asiatic languages, List of Austronesian languages, List of Indo-European languages, List of Mayan languages, List of Mongolic languages, List of Oto-Manguean languages, List of Tungusic languages, List of Turkic languages, List of Uralic languages.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Lists of languages” is wikimedia list of lists. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Lists, languages and Wikimedia, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2010—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Lists, languages and Wikimedia is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “wikimedia list of lists” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 13, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3183574. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2010.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Lists of languages”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Lists of languages primary sources, Lists of languages archive and Lists research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Lists of languages”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Lists of languages” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.