CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

List of peers 1230–1239

Wikimedia list article

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJan 25, 2025
Entity authorityQ11799614 ↗
Source-derived summary

This page lists all peers who held extant titles between 1230 and 1239.

Peerage of England

Peerage of Scotland

Peerage of Ireland

References

Cokayne, George Edward, ed. (1887). Complete peerage of England, Scotland, Ireland, Great Britain and the United Kingdom, extant, extinct or dormant. Vol. 1–8 (1st ed.). London: George Bell & Sons.

Cracroft-Brennan, Patrick. "Cracroft's Peerage" (web). Heraldic Media Limited.

Editorial summary

“List of peers 1230–1239” enters the record as wikimedia list article. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what List, peers and Wikimedia can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1230, 1239, 1887—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around List, peers and Wikimedia.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“List of peers 1230–1239” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, List, peers and Wikimedia provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 25, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q11799614. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1230, 1239 and 1887.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “List of peers 1230–1239”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow List of peers 1230–1239 primary sources, List of peers 1230–1239 archive and List research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “List of peers 1230–1239”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “List of peers 1230–1239” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.