CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

List of mocking awards

Wikimedia list article

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 24, 2026
Entity authorityQ1863877
Source-derived summary

This is a list of negative or anti-awards and mock prizes.

Arts and entertainment

Bad Sex in Fiction Award, awarded by the British magazine Literary Review

Bald Archy Prize, an Australian art prize, parodying the Australian Archibald Prize and mocking Australian celebrities

Barbara Dex Award, given annually to the "worst dressed" artist in the Eurovision Song Contest

Bookseller/Diagram Prize for Oddest Title of the Year, given for published books with the most unintentionally bizarre titles

Bunshun Kiichigo Awards, for the worst Japanese and foreign films

Bulwer-Lytton Fiction Contest, for the deliberately worst written opening sentence for a (non-existent) novel

Faux Faulkner contest, for parodying William Faulkner

Filmfail Awards, for the biggest failures of Bollywood

Ghanta Awards, recognizing the worst in Bollywood in various categories

Golden Broom Awards, for the most disappointing Chinese films

Golden Kela Awards, spotlighting the worst performances in Hindi cinema

Golden Raspberry Awards, for the worst in American cinema

Golden Mullet Awards, reviewers' picks for worst video games of the past year

Joyce Kilmer Memorial Bad Poetry Contest, annual best of the worst poetry contest at Columbia University

K Foundation art award, presented to the "worst artist of the year"

Lyttle Lytton Contest, based on the Bulwer-Lytton Fiction Contest, but with restrictions

Naomi Awards, dedicated to the year's worst music acts

Stinkers Bad Movie Awards, chosen by a Los Angeles-based group of film buffs and movie critics

Wąż Award, for the worst in Polish cinema

Turnip Prize, for deliberately bad modern art

Language and speaking

Académie de la Carpette anglaise, to "members of the French élite who distinguish themselves by relentlessly promoting the domination of the English language over the French language in France and in European institutions."

Doublespeak Award, an "ironic tribute to public speakers who have perpetuated language that is grossly deceptive, evasive, euphemistic, confusing, or self-centered"

Ernie Awards, for comments deemed misogynistic

Foot in Mouth Award, for "a baffling comment by a public figure"

Golden Bull Award, for organizations which use confusing and bad English

Un-word of the year, for a German word or word group deemed to be the year's most offensive new or recently popularized term

Word of the year, including "most unnecessary", "most outrageous", "most euphemistic", "least likely to succeed"

Science and pseudoscience

Allergen of the Year

Bent Spoon Award for paranormal or pseudo-scientific fraud

Erratic Boulder Award (orig. Bludný Balvan), for the contribution of individuals and societies in misleading the Czech public and the development of a muddy way of thinking

Goldenes Brett, for the most astonishing pseudo-scientific nuisance of the year in German-speaking countries

Honorary Academician of VRAL (Russian: Почётный академик ВРАЛ), for outstanding contribution to creation and spread of pseudoscience and antiscience in Russia

Ig Nobel Prize, started off as an award for questionable scientific achievements, but evolved into an honourable award with the slogan 'honor achievements that first make people laugh, and then make them think'. It still sporadically mocks public figures with no published research.

Pigasus Award, for paranormal fraud, presented by noted skeptic James Randi

Snuffed Candle Award for presenting pseudoscience as genuine

Sports

The Gooker Award, given each year to the worst gimmick, storyline, match or event in professional wrestling in that year.

Bidone d'oro, for the most disappointing player in Serie A Italian football league

Douglas Wilkie Medal, presented to those who do the least for Australian rules football

Mr. Irrelevant, for the last player selected in each year's NFL draft

Wooden spoon (award), usually given to an individual or team which has come last in a competition, but sometimes also to runners-up

Other

Big Brother Awards, to recognize "the government and private sector organizations ... which have done the most to threaten personal privacy"

Big Brother Awards (Australia)

Big Brother Awards (Finland)

Big Brother Awards (Italy)

Big Brother Awards (United Kingdom)

Carbuncle Cup, for bad architecture

Darwin Awards, for removing oneself from the gene pool (i.e.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “List of mocking awards” as wikimedia list article. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current 644-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where List, mocking and awards can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as wikimedia list article. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 24, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1863877. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “List of mocking awards”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow List of mocking awards primary sources, List of mocking awards archive and List research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “List of mocking awards”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from List of mocking awards” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.