List of members of the Sabor, 2016–2020
term of the Parliament of Croatia
The ninth Sabor was inaugurated on 14 October 2016. The assembly came into existence following the early parliamentary election on 11 September 2016 and consists of 151 representatives elected from 10 geographical and two special electoral districts.
On 18 May 2020, the 9th Sabor dissolved itself by a vote of 105 in favor.
Parliamentary officials
The Speaker of the Croatian Parliament (or President) from 5 May 2017 was Gordan Jandroković who served before that as one of the vice presidents. From 14 October 2016 until his resignation on 5 May 2017 Božo Petrov, the president of the Bridge of Independent Lists (MOST) was the Speaker.
Vice presidents of Sabor were from government side Milijan Brkić and former Speaker Željko Reiner (all HDZ), from opposition side Milanka Opačić (SDP). Besides Jandroković, Ivan Vrdoljak (HNS) served also as vice president until 9 June 2017. The Italian national minority MP Furio Radin took over his position on 19 June 2017.
Composition
On the basis of the early parliamentary election of 2016, the composition of the Sabor as of September 2016 is as follows. There has to be noted that national minority MPs can join other clubs as well beside the national minority group.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “List of members of the Sabor, 2016–2020” is term of the Parliament of Croatia. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through List, members and Sabor, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “term of the Parliament of Croatia” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
The record creator and administrative purpose are central evidence, because official documentation reflects both action and institutional priorities. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 19, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q28403088. None of the 2 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2016, 2020 and 2017.
Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.
- Event chronology
- Institutional context
- Locating named record creators
Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “List of members of the Sabor, 2016–2020”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow List of members of the Sabor, 2016–2020 primary sources, List of members of the Sabor, 2016–2020 archive and List research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “List of members of the Sabor, 2016–2020”?
- Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
- Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “List of members of the Sabor, 2016–2020” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.