CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Districts of Suriname

type of administrative division of Suriname

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 16, 2026
Entity authorityQ1649296 ↗
Source-derived summary

Suriname is divided into 10 districts (Dutch: districten).

Overview

History

The country was first divided up into subdivisions by the Dutch on October 8, 1834, when a Royal Decree declared that there were to be 8 divisions and 2 districts:

Upper Suriname and Torarica

Para

Upper Commewijne

Upper Cottica and Perica

Lower Commewijne

Lower Cottica

Matapica

Saramacca

Coronie (district)

Nickerie (district)

In 1851 Coronie District was upgraded to a division.

In 1927, Suriname's districts were revised, and the country was divided into 7 districts.

Commewijne

Coronie

Marowijne

Nickerie

Paramaribo

Saramacca

Suriname

In 1943, 1948, 1949, 1952 and 1959 further small modifications were made.

In 1959 the Brokopondo District was established out of the former Suriname District.

In 1968 the districts were redrawn again, into

Brokopondo District

Commewijne District

Coronie District

Marowijne District

Nickerie District

Para District was split from the Suriname District.

Paramaribo District

Saramacca District

Suriname District

These divisions remained until 1980, when yet again, the borders of the districts were redrawn, however, with the following requirements:

Changes in the old boundaries were made only if it leads to improved functioning

Each area should be developed

The new boundaries should respect the identities of indigenous people.

In 1983

Saramacca District was created.

Para District quadrupled in size.

Sipaliwini District was created from parts of Nickerie District.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Districts of Suriname” is type of administrative division of Suriname. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Districts, Suriname and type, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1834, 1851, 1927, 1943—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Districts, Suriname and type is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “type of administrative division of Suriname” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 16, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1649296. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1834, 1851, 1927 and 1943.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Districts of Suriname”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Districts of Suriname primary sources, Districts of Suriname archive and Districts research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Districts of Suriname”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Districts of Suriname” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.